Somalia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net ODA received
Somalia
56.1%
in 1990
Sub-Saharan Africa
3.7%
in 2011
Somalia rank
1st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
4th
Net ODA received over time
- Somalia
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 56.1% against 3.7% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 52.4%.
That makes Somalia's figure about 15.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Somalia has been ahead every year.
Somalia ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Somalia | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11.8% | 2.5% | 9.3% | Somalia |
| 1970s | 22.8% | 2.3% | 20.5% | Somalia |
| 1980s | 51.9% | 4.0% | 47.9% | Somalia |
| 1990s | 56.1% | 5.9% | 50.2% | Somalia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received, Somalia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Somalia, at 56.1% against 3.7% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 1990.
- What is the difference in net oda received between Somalia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 52.4%, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Somalia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 1990.
- How do Somalia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net oda received?
- Somalia ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 4th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.