How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Namibia?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Brazil vs Namibia: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations

Brazil

1,390 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

1,428 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Brazil rank

148th

Namibia rank

146th

Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations over time

Brazil
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1,428 US dollar per square kilometre against 1,390 US dollar per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 38 US dollar per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 148th and Namibia ranks 146th of 165 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Brazil	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	1,475 US dollar per square kilometre	653.99 US dollar per square kilometre	821.36 US dollar per square kilometre	Brazil
2010s	1,656 US dollar per square kilometre	869.76 US dollar per square kilometre	785.91 US dollar per square kilometre	Brazil
2020s	1,214 US dollar per square kilometre	1,202 US dollar per square kilometre	12.04 US dollar per square kilometre	Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations, Brazil or Namibia?: Namibia, at 1,428 US dollar per square kilometre against 1,390 US dollar per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations between Brazil and Namibia?: 38 US dollar per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Namibia?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Namibia rank globally for other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations?: Brazil ranks 148th and Namibia ranks 146th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Namibia: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-debt-instruments-deposit-taking-corporations-except-the-central-bank-4/brazil/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-debt-instruments-deposit-taking-corporations-except-the-central-bank-4/brazil/namibia/">Brazil vs Namibia: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit: US dollar per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 3,853 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 28 August 2026

Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.