Malta vs Mauritius: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations

Malta
25.06 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
7.25 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
8th
Mauritius rank
11th

Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations over time

  • Malta
  • Mauritius
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M198020012023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 25.06 million US dollar per square kilometre against 7.25 million US dollar per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 17.80 million US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 3.5 times Mauritius's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 8th and Mauritius ranks 11th of 165 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Mauritius Difference Ahead
1980s 210,069 US dollar per square kilometre 6,806 US dollar per square kilometre 203,263 US dollar per square kilometre Malta
1990s 7.39 million US dollar per square kilometre 134,848 US dollar per square kilometre 7.26 million US dollar per square kilometre Malta
2000s 44.84 million US dollar per square kilometre 1.62 million US dollar per square kilometre 43.22 million US dollar per square kilometre Malta
2010s 67.77 million US dollar per square kilometre 7.72 million US dollar per square kilometre 60.04 million US dollar per square kilometre Malta
2020s 30.89 million US dollar per square kilometre 7.21 million US dollar per square kilometre 23.68 million US dollar per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations, Malta or Mauritius?
Malta, at 25.06 million US dollar per square kilometre against 7.25 million US dollar per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations between Malta and Mauritius?
17.80 million US dollar per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mauritius?
33 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Malta and Mauritius rank globally for other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations?
Malta ranks 8th and Mauritius ranks 11th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Mauritius: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-debt-instruments-deposit-taking-corporations-except-the-central-bank-4/malta/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-debt-instruments-deposit-taking-corporations-except-the-central-bank-4/malta/mauritius/">Malta vs Mauritius: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 3,853 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.