North Macedonia vs South Africa: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations

North Macedonia
29,149 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
29,141 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia rank
90th
South Africa rank
91st

Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations over time

  • North Macedonia
  • South Africa
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199120072023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 29,149 US dollar per square kilometre against 29,141 US dollar per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 8 US dollar per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 90th and South Africa ranks 91st of 165 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 12,367 US dollar per square kilometre 1,927 US dollar per square kilometre 10,441 US dollar per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 27,634 US dollar per square kilometre 15,305 US dollar per square kilometre 12,329 US dollar per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 29,744 US dollar per square kilometre 25,702 US dollar per square kilometre 4,042 US dollar per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 29,380 US dollar per square kilometre 30,601 US dollar per square kilometre 1,220 US dollar per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations, North Macedonia or South Africa?
North Macedonia, at 29,149 US dollar per square kilometre against 29,141 US dollar per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations between North Macedonia and South Africa?
8 US dollar per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and South Africa?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do North Macedonia and South Africa rank globally for other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations?
North Macedonia ranks 90th and South Africa ranks 91st of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs South Africa: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-debt-instruments-deposit-taking-corporations-except-the-central-bank-4/north-macedonia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-debt-instruments-deposit-taking-corporations-except-the-central-bank-4/north-macedonia/south-africa/">North Macedonia vs South Africa: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 3,853 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.