Norway vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations

Norway
368,092 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2022
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
366,677 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
45th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
46th

Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations over time

  • Norway
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0200.0k400.0k600.0k198020012023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 368,092 US dollar per square kilometre against 366,677 US dollar per square kilometre in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 1,415 US dollar per square kilometre.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.

Norway ranks 45th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 46th of 165 countries.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
2010s 317,171 US dollar per square kilometre 401,891 US dollar per square kilometre 84,720 US dollar per square kilometre Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 374,238 US dollar per square kilometre 542,683 US dollar per square kilometre 168,445 US dollar per square kilometre Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations, Norway or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Norway, at 368,092 US dollar per square kilometre against 366,677 US dollar per square kilometre in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2022.
What is the difference in other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations between Norway and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
1,415 US dollar per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
10 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2022.
How do Norway and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for other investment, debt instruments, deposit taking corporations?
Norway ranks 45th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 46th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-debt-instruments-deposit-taking-corporations-except-the-central-bank-4/norway/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-debt-instruments-deposit-taking-corporations-except-the-central-bank-4/norway/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Norway vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 3,853 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other investment, Debt instruments, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.