Guinea-Bissau vs North Macedonia: Other investment, Debt instruments, Other financial corporations

Guinea-Bissau
1.97 million US dollar
in 2020
North Macedonia
2.02 million US dollar
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
100th
North Macedonia rank
98th

Other investment, Debt instruments, Other financial corporations over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • North Macedonia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M200820162025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 2.02 million US dollar against 1.97 million US dollar in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 54,890 US dollar.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 100th and North Macedonia ranks 98th of 129 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2010s 949,786 US dollar 561,531 US dollar 388,255 US dollar Guinea-Bissau
2020s 1.97 million US dollar 328,458 US dollar 1.64 million US dollar Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, debt instruments, other financial corporations, Guinea-Bissau or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 2.02 million US dollar against 1.97 million US dollar in Guinea-Bissau as of 2025.
What is the difference in other investment, debt instruments, other financial corporations between Guinea-Bissau and North Macedonia?
54,890 US dollar, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and North Macedonia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and North Macedonia rank globally for other investment, debt instruments, other financial corporations?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 100th and North Macedonia ranks 98th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Other investment, Debt instruments, Other financial corporations (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs North Macedonia: Other investment, Debt instruments, Other financial corporations. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-debt-instruments-other-financial-corporations-assets-positions-us-dollar/guinea-bissau/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-debt-instruments-other-financial-corporations-assets-positions-us-dollar/guinea-bissau/north-macedonia/">Guinea-Bissau vs North Macedonia: Other investment, Debt instruments, Other financial corporations</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Debt instruments, Other financial corporations (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
132 places, 2,011 data points, 1989–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.