Belarus vs Mauritius: PNG, commercial banks and other creditors (NFL, current US$)

Belarus
927.15 million NFL, current US$
in 2025
Mauritius
856.12 million NFL, current US$
in 2025
Belarus rank
21st
Mauritius rank
22nd

PNG, commercial banks and other creditors (NFL, current US$) over time

  • Belarus
  • Mauritius
-2.0B-1.0B01.0B2.0B197219982025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 927.15 million NFL, current US$ against 856.12 million NFL, current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 71.03 million NFL, current US$.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 21st and Mauritius ranks 22nd of 93 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 144.66 million NFL, current US$ 501.31 million NFL, current US$ 356.65 million NFL, current US$ Mauritius
2010s 233.21 million NFL, current US$ -11.59 million NFL, current US$ 244.80 million NFL, current US$ Belarus
2020s -552.52 million NFL, current US$ 109.75 million NFL, current US$ 662.27 million NFL, current US$ Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher png, commercial banks and other creditors, Belarus or Mauritius?
Belarus, at 927.15 million NFL, current US$ against 856.12 million NFL, current US$ in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in png, commercial banks and other creditors between Belarus and Mauritius?
71.03 million NFL, current US$, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mauritius?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Mauritius rank globally for png, commercial banks and other creditors?
Belarus ranks 21st and Mauritius ranks 22nd of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as PNG, commercial banks and other creditors (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Mauritius: PNG, commercial banks and other creditors. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/png-commercial-banks-and-other-creditors-nfl-current-us/belarus/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/png-commercial-banks-and-other-creditors-nfl-current-us/belarus/mauritius/">Belarus vs Mauritius: PNG, commercial banks and other creditors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PNG, commercial banks and other creditors (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
106 places, 3,771 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Nonguaranteed long-term commercial bank loans from private banks and other private financial institutions. Net flows (or net lending or net disbursements) received by the borrower during the year are disbursements minus principal repayments. Data are in current U.S. dollars.