Hong Kong, China vs Switzerland: Portfolio investment, Debt securities

Hong Kong, China
1.06 trillion US dollar
in 2025
Switzerland
848.39 billion US dollar
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
10th
Switzerland rank
12th

Portfolio investment, Debt securities over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Switzerland
0250.0B500.0B750.0B1.0T198320042025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.06 trillion US dollar against 848.39 billion US dollar in Switzerland, a difference of 216.28 billion US dollar.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.3 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Switzerland ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 10th and Switzerland ranks 12th of 161 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 204.23 billion US dollar 446.15 billion US dollar 241.92 billion US dollar Switzerland
2010s 466.31 billion US dollar 683.85 billion US dollar 217.54 billion US dollar Switzerland
2020s 804.45 billion US dollar 744.80 billion US dollar 59.65 billion US dollar Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher portfolio investment, debt securities, Hong Kong, China or Switzerland?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.06 trillion US dollar against 848.39 billion US dollar in Switzerland as of 2025.
What is the difference in portfolio investment, debt securities between Hong Kong, China and Switzerland?
216.28 billion US dollar, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Switzerland?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Switzerland rank globally for portfolio investment, debt securities?
Hong Kong, China ranks 10th and Switzerland ranks 12th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Portfolio investment, Debt securities (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Switzerland: Portfolio investment, Debt securities. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-debt-securities-assets-positions-us-dollar/hong-kong-sar-china/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-debt-securities-assets-positions-us-dollar/hong-kong-sar-china/switzerland/">Hong Kong, China vs Switzerland: Portfolio investment, Debt securities</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Portfolio investment, Debt securities (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
164 places, 3,891 data points, 1948–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.