Curaçao and Sint Maarten vs Hong Kong: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Deposit taking corporations

Curaçao and Sint Maarten
110.75 million US dollar
in 2024
Hong Kong
658.07 billion US dollar
in 2025
Curaçao and Sint Maarten rank
1st
Hong Kong rank
3rd

Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Deposit taking corporations over time

  • Curaçao and Sint Maarten
  • Hong Kong
0200.0B400.0B600.0B200020122025

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 658.07 billion US dollar against 110.75 million US dollar in Curaçao and Sint Maarten, a difference of 657.96 billion US dollar.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 5,942.1 times Curaçao and Sint Maarten's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Curaçao and Sint Maarten ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 1 regions.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curaçao and Sint Maarten Hong Kong Difference Ahead
2010s 312.30 million US dollar 204.67 billion US dollar 204.36 billion US dollar Hong Kong
2020s 190.48 million US dollar 426.43 billion US dollar 426.24 billion US dollar Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher portfolio investment, debt securities, deposit taking corporations, Curaçao and Sint Maarten or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 658.07 billion US dollar against 110.75 million US dollar in Curaçao and Sint Maarten as of 2025.
What is the difference in portfolio investment, debt securities, deposit taking corporations between Curaçao and Sint Maarten and Hong Kong?
657.96 billion US dollar, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Sint Maarten and Hong Kong?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Curaçao and Sint Maarten and Hong Kong rank globally for portfolio investment, debt securities, deposit taking corporations?
Curaçao and Sint Maarten ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 1 regions.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank, Long-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curaçao and Sint Maarten vs Hong Kong: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Deposit taking corporations. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-debt-securities-deposit-taking-corporations-except-the-central-bank-2/curacao-and-sint-maarten/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-debt-securities-deposit-taking-corporations-except-the-central-bank-2/curacao-and-sint-maarten/hong-kong-sar-china/">Curaçao and Sint Maarten vs Hong Kong: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Deposit taking corporations</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Deposit taking corporations, except the Central Bank, Long-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
141 places, 2,950 data points, 1979–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.