Denmark vs Hong Kong, China: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term

Denmark
180.79 billion US dollar
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
246.01 billion US dollar
in 2025
Denmark rank
16th
Hong Kong, China rank
14th

Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term over time

  • Denmark
  • Hong Kong, China
050.0B100.0B150.0B200.0B250.0B199120082025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 246.01 billion US dollar against 180.79 billion US dollar in Denmark, a difference of 65.22 billion US dollar.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.4 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Denmark ranks 16th and Hong Kong, China ranks 14th of 141 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 70.32 billion US dollar 59.99 billion US dollar 10.33 billion US dollar Denmark
2010s 165.15 billion US dollar 127.68 billion US dollar 37.47 billion US dollar Denmark
2020s 179.88 billion US dollar 203.93 billion US dollar 24.05 billion US dollar Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher portfolio investment, debt securities, other sectors (bpm6), long-term, Denmark or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 246.01 billion US dollar against 180.79 billion US dollar in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in portfolio investment, debt securities, other sectors (bpm6), long-term between Denmark and Hong Kong, China?
65.22 billion US dollar, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Hong Kong, China?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Hong Kong, China rank globally for portfolio investment, debt securities, other sectors (bpm6), long-term?
Denmark ranks 16th and Hong Kong, China ranks 14th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Hong Kong, China: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-debt-securities-other-sectors-bpm6-long-term-assets-positions-us/denmark/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-debt-securities-other-sectors-bpm6-long-term-assets-positions-us/denmark/hong-kong-sar-china/">Denmark vs Hong Kong, China: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
144 places, 3,038 data points, 1948–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.