Hong Kong, China vs Korea: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term

Hong Kong, China
246.01 billion US dollar
in 2025
Korea
175.25 billion US dollar
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
14th
Korea rank
17th

Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Korea
050.0B100.0B150.0B200.0B250.0B199420092025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 246.01 billion US dollar against 175.25 billion US dollar in Korea, a difference of 70.76 billion US dollar.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.4 times Korea's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 14th and Korea ranks 17th of 141 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 59.99 billion US dollar 16.99 billion US dollar 43.00 billion US dollar Hong Kong, China
2010s 127.68 billion US dollar 72.57 billion US dollar 55.12 billion US dollar Hong Kong, China
2020s 203.93 billion US dollar 164.50 billion US dollar 39.44 billion US dollar Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher portfolio investment, debt securities, other sectors (bpm6), long-term, Hong Kong, China or Korea?
Hong Kong, China, at 246.01 billion US dollar against 175.25 billion US dollar in Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in portfolio investment, debt securities, other sectors (bpm6), long-term between Hong Kong, China and Korea?
70.76 billion US dollar, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Korea?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Korea rank globally for portfolio investment, debt securities, other sectors (bpm6), long-term?
Hong Kong, China ranks 14th and Korea ranks 17th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Korea: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-debt-securities-other-sectors-bpm6-long-term-assets-positions-us/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-debt-securities-other-sectors-bpm6-long-term-assets-positions-us/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/">Hong Kong, China vs Korea: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
144 places, 3,038 data points, 1948–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.