Serbia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term

Serbia
77.40 million US dollar
in 2025
Turks and Caicos Islands
63.00 million US dollar
in 2018
Serbia rank
84th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
85th

Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term over time

  • Serbia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M200820162025

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 77.40 million US dollar against 63.00 million US dollar in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 14.40 million US dollar.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Serbia ranks 84th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 85th of 141 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher portfolio investment, debt securities, other sectors (bpm6), long-term, Serbia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Serbia, at 77.40 million US dollar against 63.00 million US dollar in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in portfolio investment, debt securities, other sectors (bpm6), long-term between Serbia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
14.40 million US dollar, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
How do Serbia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for portfolio investment, debt securities, other sectors (bpm6), long-term?
Serbia ranks 84th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 85th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-debt-securities-other-sectors-bpm6-long-term-assets-positions-us/serbia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-debt-securities-other-sectors-bpm6-long-term-assets-positions-us/serbia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Serbia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Portfolio investment, Debt securities, Other Sectors (BPM6), Long-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
144 places, 3,038 data points, 1948–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.