Hong Kong vs Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less)

Hong Kong
140.75 billion
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
-20.88 billion
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
2nd
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) rank
5th

Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less) over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
-50.0B050.0B100.0B150.0B200520142024

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 140.75 billion against -20.88 billion in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), a difference of 161.63 billion.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 6.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 2nd and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 5th of 193 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Difference Ahead
2000s 26.99 billion -2.22 billion 29.21 billion Hong Kong
2010s 37.85 billion -16.30 billion 54.15 billion Hong Kong
2020s 77.37 billion 4.64 billion 72.74 billion Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher portfolio investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less), Hong Kong or Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)?
Hong Kong, at 140.75 billion against -20.88 billion in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as of 2024.
What is the difference in portfolio investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less) between Hong Kong and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)?
161.63 billion, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) rank globally for portfolio investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less)?
Hong Kong ranks 2nd and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 5th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net incurrence of liabilities) (US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-net-net-acquisition-of-financial-assets-less-net-incurrence-of/hong-kong-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-net-net-acquisition-of-financial-assets-less-net-incurrence-of/hong-kong-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/">Hong Kong vs Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net incurrence of liabilities) (US dollar)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
202 places, 3,694 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The World and Country Group Aggregates (historically called BOPSY) is an annual publication, released each November, of major balance of payments and international investment position components for countries, country groups, and the world.