Montserrat vs Zimbabwe: Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less)

Montserrat
18.69 million
in 2024
Zimbabwe
22.60 million
in 2024
Montserrat rank
96th
Zimbabwe rank
93rd

Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less) over time

  • Montserrat
  • Zimbabwe
-150.0M-100.0M-50.0M050.0M100.0M200520142024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 22.60 million against 18.69 million in Montserrat, a difference of 3.91 million.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Montserrat's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Montserrat ahead.

Montserrat ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 193 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Montserrat averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montserrat Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s -1.87 million -67.00 million 65.13 million Montserrat
2010s 2.87 million -20.35 million 23.22 million Montserrat
2020s 17.56 million 65.69 million 48.14 million Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher portfolio investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less), Montserrat or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 22.60 million against 18.69 million in Montserrat as of 2024.
What is the difference in portfolio investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less) between Montserrat and Zimbabwe?
3.91 million, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montserrat and Zimbabwe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
How do Montserrat and Zimbabwe rank globally for portfolio investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less)?
Montserrat ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net incurrence of liabilities) (US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montserrat vs Zimbabwe: Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-net-net-acquisition-of-financial-assets-less-net-incurrence-of/montserrat/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-net-net-acquisition-of-financial-assets-less-net-incurrence-of/montserrat/zimbabwe/">Montserrat vs Zimbabwe: Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Portfolio investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net incurrence of liabilities) (US dollar)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
202 places, 3,694 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The World and Country Group Aggregates (historically called BOPSY) is an annual publication, released each November, of major balance of payments and international investment position components for countries, country groups, and the world.