East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Serbia: PPG, commercial banks

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
28.45 billion NFL, current US$
in 2024
Serbia
1.65 billion NFL, current US$
in 2024
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
4th
Serbia rank
5th

PPG, commercial banks over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Serbia
-10.0B010.0B20.0B30.0B197019972024

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) currently reports 28.45 billion NFL, current US$ against 1.65 billion NFL, current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 26.81 billion NFL, current US$.

That makes East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s figure about 17.3 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1970 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 5th of 12 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 4 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Serbia Difference Ahead
1970s 543.83 million NFL, current US$ 15.40 million NFL, current US$ 528.43 million NFL, current US$ East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1980s 1.91 billion NFL, current US$ 28.34 million NFL, current US$ 1.88 billion NFL, current US$ East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s -534.79 million NFL, current US$ -349.55 million NFL, current US$ 185.24 million NFL, current US$ Serbia
2000s -1.82 billion NFL, current US$ 24.41 million NFL, current US$ 1.85 billion NFL, current US$ Serbia
2010s 7.33 billion NFL, current US$ 43.32 million NFL, current US$ 7.29 billion NFL, current US$ East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2020s 16.05 billion NFL, current US$ 860.04 million NFL, current US$ 15.19 billion NFL, current US$ East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ppg, commercial banks, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Serbia?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), at 28.45 billion NFL, current US$ against 1.65 billion NFL, current US$ in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in ppg, commercial banks between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Serbia?
26.81 billion NFL, current US$, with East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Serbia?
48 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Serbia rank globally for ppg, commercial banks?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 5th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as PPG, commercial banks (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Serbia: PPG, commercial banks. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-commercial-banks-nfl-current-us/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-commercial-banks-nfl-current-us/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/serbia/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Serbia: PPG, commercial banks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PPG, commercial banks (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
128 places, 4,660 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Public and publicly guaranteed commercial bank loans from private banks and other private financial institutions. Net flows (or net lending or net disbursements) received by the borrower during the year are disbursements minus principal repayments. Data are in current U.S. dollars.