Ecuador vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): PPG, commercial banks

Ecuador
944.87 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
3.78 billion NFL, current US$
in 2024
Ecuador rank
8th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
7th

PPG, commercial banks over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
-2.5B02.5B5.0B7.5B197019972024

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) currently reports 3.78 billion NFL, current US$ against 944.87 million NFL, current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 2.83 billion NFL, current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s figure about 4.0 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.

Ecuador ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 7th of 116 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1970s 128.26 million NFL, current US$ 617.05 million NFL, current US$ 488.79 million NFL, current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
1980s 147.82 million NFL, current US$ 285.41 million NFL, current US$ 137.59 million NFL, current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
1990s 61.30 million NFL, current US$ 3.00 million NFL, current US$ 58.29 million NFL, current US$ Ecuador
2000s -83.86 million NFL, current US$ 250.40 million NFL, current US$ 334.25 million NFL, current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2010s 186.72 million NFL, current US$ 4.50 billion NFL, current US$ 4.31 billion NFL, current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2020s -53.95 million NFL, current US$ 2.33 billion NFL, current US$ 2.39 billion NFL, current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ppg, commercial banks, Ecuador or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), at 3.78 billion NFL, current US$ against 944.87 million NFL, current US$ in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in ppg, commercial banks between Ecuador and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
2.83 billion NFL, current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for ppg, commercial banks?
Ecuador ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 7th of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as PPG, commercial banks (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): PPG, commercial banks. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-commercial-banks-nfl-current-us/ecuador/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-commercial-banks-nfl-current-us/ecuador/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Ecuador vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): PPG, commercial banks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PPG, commercial banks (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
128 places, 4,660 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Public and publicly guaranteed commercial bank loans from private banks and other private financial institutions. Net flows (or net lending or net disbursements) received by the borrower during the year are disbursements minus principal repayments. Data are in current U.S. dollars.