Bangladesh vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time
- Bangladesh
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 56,649 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 848.87 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 55,800 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 66.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 9th of 121 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2,526 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 89.28 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 2,437 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Bangladesh |
| 1980s | 5,004 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 237.26 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 4,767 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Bangladesh |
| 1990s | 3,758 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 143.71 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 3,614 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 3,900 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 96.38 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 3,804 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 16,873 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 679.29 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 16,194 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 55,888 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 725.55 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 55,163 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Bangladesh, at 56,649 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 848.87 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 55,800 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
- Bangladesh ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 9th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.