Brazil vs Central African Republic: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
104.81 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic
15.88 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
84th
Central African Republic rank
87th

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Central African Republic
-50005001.0k197019962023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 104.81 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 15.88 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 88.93 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 6.6 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 84th and Central African Republic ranks 87th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 5 and Central African Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Central African Republic Difference Ahead
1970s 59.85 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 9.68 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 50.17 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 103.39 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 73.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 30.19 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s -48.32 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 59.91 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 108.23 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 18.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre -15.04 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 33.24 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 131.43 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 48.25 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 83.18 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 45.15 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 26.57 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 18.58 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Central African Republic?
Brazil, at 104.81 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 15.88 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Central African Republic?
88.93 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Central African Republic?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Central African Republic rank globally for ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 84th and Central African Republic ranks 87th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Central African Republic: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/central-african-republic/">Brazil vs Central African Republic: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,176 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.