Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
976.71 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1,057 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
61st
Zimbabwe rank
58th

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1,057 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 976.71 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 80.29 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 58th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 69.94 NFL, US$ per square kilometre -14.43 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 84.37 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1980s 236.72 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 305.7 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 68.98 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 310.35 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 335.41 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 25.06 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 623.91 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 85.44 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 538.47 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 665.09 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 336.15 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 328.94 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 1,423 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 551.9 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 871.02 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1,057 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 976.71 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
80.29 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 58th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,176 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.