Colombia vs South Africa: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Colombia
659.48 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
517.24 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
70th
South Africa rank
71st

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • South Africa
-1.0k01.0k2.0k3.0k197019962023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 659.48 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 517.24 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 142.24 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.3 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 70th and South Africa ranks 71st of 121 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 860.03 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 36.04 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 824 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 638.76 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 23.63 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 615.13 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 1,196 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 701.9 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 494.43 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 2,145 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 1,038 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 1,107 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Colombia or South Africa?
Colombia, at 659.48 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 517.24 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Colombia and South Africa?
142.24 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and South Africa?
25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Colombia and South Africa rank globally for ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 70th and South Africa ranks 71st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs South Africa: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/south-africa/">Colombia vs South Africa: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,176 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.