Dominican Republic vs Low income: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Dominican Republic
24,308 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income
471.55 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
13th
Low income rank
11th

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Low income
-20.0k020.0k197019962023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 24,308 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 471.55 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 23,836 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 51.5 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Low income ranks 11th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 5 and Low income in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Low income Difference Ahead
1970s 798.68 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 79.61 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 719.08 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1980s 3,280 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 356.62 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 2,923 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1990s -210.69 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 144.89 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 355.58 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Low income
2000s 5,202 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 184.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 5,018 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 5,670 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 403.97 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 5,266 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2020s 13,547 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 326.63 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 13,220 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Dominican Republic or Low income?
Dominican Republic, at 24,308 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 471.55 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Dominican Republic and Low income?
23,836 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Low income?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Low income rank globally for ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Low income ranks 11th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Low income: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/low-income/">Dominican Republic vs Low income: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,176 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.