El Salvador vs Low & middle income: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

El Salvador
53,149 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income
1,219 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
7th
Low & middle income rank
6th

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Low & middle income
020.0k40.0k60.0k197019962023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 53,149 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 1,219 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 51,930 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 43.6 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 7th and Low & middle income ranks 6th of 121 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Low & middle income Difference Ahead
1970s 1,841 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 117.8 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 1,723 NFL, US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 6,534 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 300.71 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 6,234 NFL, US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 5,819 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 216.05 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 5,603 NFL, US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 5,790 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 81.99 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 5,708 NFL, US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 3,066 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 642.47 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 2,423 NFL, US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 27,530 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 1,023 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 26,506 NFL, US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Low & middle income?
El Salvador, at 53,149 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 1,219 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Low & middle income?
51,930 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Low & middle income?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Low & middle income rank globally for ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 7th and Low & middle income ranks 6th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Low & middle income: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/low-and-middle-income/">El Salvador vs Low & middle income: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,176 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.