Morocco vs Zimbabwe: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Morocco
1,379 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1,057 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
55th
Zimbabwe rank
58th

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Morocco
  • Zimbabwe
-2.0k02.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 1,379 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 1,057 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 322 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Morocco ahead.

Morocco ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 58th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 449.94 NFL, US$ per square kilometre -14.43 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 464.37 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 1,362 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 305.7 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 1,056 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 150.33 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 335.41 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 185.08 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 497.04 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 85.44 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 411.6 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 2,439 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 336.15 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 2,102 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 2,685 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 551.9 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 2,133 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Morocco or Zimbabwe?
Morocco, at 1,379 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 1,057 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Morocco and Zimbabwe?
322 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Zimbabwe rank globally for ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Morocco ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 58th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Zimbabwe: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/morocco/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/morocco/zimbabwe/">Morocco vs Zimbabwe: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,176 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.