Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Rwanda
37,136 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
25,743 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
11th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
12th

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-10.0k010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 37,136 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 25,743 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 11,393 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.4 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Rwanda ranks 11th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 12th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 1,040 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 4,710 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 3,670 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 2,091 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 9,588 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 7,497 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 2,357 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 14,348 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 11,991 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 2,510 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 4,647 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 2,137 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 11,854 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 13,313 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 1,460 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 26,495 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 7,126 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 19,370 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Rwanda or Sao Tome and Principe?
Rwanda, at 37,136 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 25,743 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
11,393 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for ppg, official creditors (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 11th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 12th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-official-creditors-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/">Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,176 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.