Bangladesh vs Tanzania, United Republic of: PPG, private creditors (NFL, US$), annual growth rate

Bangladesh
-61.07 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
-70.15 % change on previous year
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
88th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
90th

PPG, private creditors (NFL, US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-50005001.0k197119972024

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports -61.07 % change on previous year against -70.15 % change on previous year in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 9.08 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 88th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 90th of 117 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s -69.58 % change on previous year 252.7 % change on previous year 322.28 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s -9.03 % change on previous year -2.91 % change on previous year 6.12 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s -0.3403 % change on previous year -19.43 % change on previous year 19.09 % change on previous year Bangladesh
2000s 5.09 % change on previous year 29.95 % change on previous year 24.86 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 21.06 % change on previous year 43.42 % change on previous year 22.36 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 10.86 % change on previous year 144.38 % change on previous year 133.51 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ppg, private creditors (nfl, us$), annual growth rate, Bangladesh or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Bangladesh, at -61.07 % change on previous year against -70.15 % change on previous year in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in ppg, private creditors (nfl, us$), annual growth rate between Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of?
9.08 % change on previous year, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of?
43 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for ppg, private creditors (nfl, us$), annual growth rate?
Bangladesh ranks 88th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 90th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as PPG, private creditors (NFL, US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Tanzania, United Republic of: PPG, private creditors (NFL, US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-private-creditors-nfl-us-annual-growth-rate/bangladesh/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ppg-private-creditors-nfl-us-annual-growth-rate/bangladesh/tanzania/">Bangladesh vs Tanzania, United Republic of: PPG, private creditors (NFL, US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
PPG, private creditors (NFL, US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 4,725 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in PPG, private creditors (NFL, US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.