Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Securities Other Than Shares, Liabilities of Central Bank: Securities
Brazil
0
in 2008
Sri Lanka
0
in 2015
Brazil rank
17th
Sri Lanka rank
17th
Securities Other Than Shares, Liabilities of Central Bank: Securities over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 against 0 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Brazil ranks 17th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 91 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 166.92 | 300.52 million | 300.52 million | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 21.08 billion | 598.00 million | 20.48 billion | Brazil |
| 2000s | 2.66 billion | 0 | 2.66 billion | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher securities other than shares, liabilities of central bank: securities, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Brazil, at 0 against 0 in Sri Lanka as of 2008.
- What is the difference in securities other than shares, liabilities of central bank: securities between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2008.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for securities other than shares, liabilities of central bank: securities?
- Brazil ranks 17th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 91 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Securities Other Than Shares, Liabilities of Central Bank: Securities (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.