Eritrea vs Eswatini: Total ODA Private Net, all donors
Total ODA Private Net, all donors over time
- Eritrea
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports -4.21 million current US$ against -14.80 million current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 10.59 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eritrea ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 37th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3.21 million current US$ | 18.00 million current US$ | 21.21 million current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2000s | -2.08 million current US$ | 2.88 million current US$ | 4.96 million current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2010s | -2.46 million current US$ | -10.64 million current US$ | 8.19 million current US$ | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total oda private net, all donors, Eritrea or Eswatini?
- Eritrea, at -4.21 million current US$ against -14.80 million current US$ in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in total oda private net, all donors between Eritrea and Eswatini?
- 10.59 million current US$, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Eswatini?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Eswatini rank globally for total oda private net, all donors?
- Eritrea ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 37th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Total ODA Private Net, all donors (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net private aid is private transactions broken down into direct investment, portfolio investment and export credits (net). Private transactions are those undertaken by firms and individuals resident in the reporting country. Portfolio investment corresponds to bonds and equities. Inflows into emerging countries’ stocks markets, are, however, heavily understated. Accordingly, the coverage of portfolio investment differs in these regards from the coverage of bank claims, which include indistinguishably export credit lending by banks. The bank claims data represent the net change in banks’ claims after adjustment to eliminate the effect of changes in exchange rates. They are therefore a proxy for net flow data, but are not themselves a net flow figure. They differ in two further regards from other OECD data. First, they relate to loans by banks resident in countries which report quarterly to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Secondly, no adjustment has been made to exclude short-term claims.