Burundi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors

Burundi
-6.12 million current US$
in 2011
Sao Tome and Principe
-10.68 million current US$
in 2011
Burundi rank
35th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
36th

Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors over time

  • Burundi
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-50.0M-25.0M025.0M50.0M75.0M196919902011

How they compare

Burundi currently reports -6.12 million current US$ against -10.68 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 4.56 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 35th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 36th of 53 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1980s -1.31 million current US$ 2.16 million current US$ 3.48 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
1990s -1.50 million current US$ -2.17 million current US$ 671,000 current US$ Burundi
2000s -5.06 million current US$ -1.19 million current US$ 3.87 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 28.95 million current US$ -7.09 million current US$ 36.05 million current US$ Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total oda private net, dac donors, Burundi or Sao Tome and Principe?
Burundi, at -6.12 million current US$ against -10.68 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2011.
What is the difference in total oda private net, dac donors between Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe?
4.56 million current US$, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2011.
How do Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for total oda private net, dac donors?
Burundi ranks 35th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 36th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/total-oda-private-net-dac-donors-current-us/burundi/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/total-oda-private-net-dac-donors-current-us/burundi/sao-tome-and-principe/">Burundi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 2,470 data points, 1968–2011
Last refreshed

Net private aid is private transactions broken down into direct investment, portfolio investment and export credits (net). Private transactions are those undertaken by firms and individuals resident in the reporting country. Portfolio investment corresponds to bonds and equities. Inflows into emerging countries’ stocks markets, are, however, heavily understated. Accordingly, the coverage of portfolio investment differs in these regards from the coverage of bank claims, which include indistinguishably export credit lending by banks. The bank claims data represent the net change in banks’ claims after adjustment to eliminate the effect of changes in exchange rates. They are therefore a proxy for net flow data, but are not themselves a net flow figure. They differ in two further regards from other OECD data. First, they relate to loans by banks resident in countries which report quarterly to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Secondly, no adjustment has been made to exclude short-term claims. Data are expressed in current U.S. dollars.