Chad vs Eritrea: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors
Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors over time
- Chad
- Eritrea
How they compare
Chad currently reports 760,000 current US$ against -4.21 million current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 4.97 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 31st and Eritrea ranks 34th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38.06 million current US$ | -3.21 million current US$ | 41.26 million current US$ | Chad |
| 2000s | -16.30 million current US$ | -2.08 million current US$ | 14.22 million current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2010s | -9.94 million current US$ | -2.46 million current US$ | 7.49 million current US$ | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total oda private net, dac donors, Chad or Eritrea?
- Chad, at 760,000 current US$ against -4.21 million current US$ in Eritrea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in total oda private net, dac donors between Chad and Eritrea?
- 4.97 million current US$, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eritrea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Chad and Eritrea rank globally for total oda private net, dac donors?
- Chad ranks 31st and Eritrea ranks 34th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net private aid is private transactions broken down into direct investment, portfolio investment and export credits (net). Private transactions are those undertaken by firms and individuals resident in the reporting country. Portfolio investment corresponds to bonds and equities. Inflows into emerging countries’ stocks markets, are, however, heavily understated. Accordingly, the coverage of portfolio investment differs in these regards from the coverage of bank claims, which include indistinguishably export credit lending by banks. The bank claims data represent the net change in banks’ claims after adjustment to eliminate the effect of changes in exchange rates. They are therefore a proxy for net flow data, but are not themselves a net flow figure. They differ in two further regards from other OECD data. First, they relate to loans by banks resident in countries which report quarterly to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Secondly, no adjustment has been made to exclude short-term claims. Data are expressed in current U.S. dollars.