Equatorial Guinea vs Liberia: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors

Equatorial Guinea
-126.18 million current US$
in 2011
Liberia
-107.27 million current US$
in 2011
Equatorial Guinea rank
48th
Liberia rank
47th

Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Liberia
-2.0B02.0B4.0B196819892011

How they compare

Liberia currently reports -107.27 million current US$ against -126.18 million current US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 18.91 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Liberia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 48th and Liberia ranks 47th of 53 countries.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Liberia Difference Ahead
1970s -1.70 million current US$ 420.66 million current US$ 422.36 million current US$ Liberia
1980s 2.60 million current US$ 8.27 million current US$ 5.67 million current US$ Liberia
1990s -1.13 million current US$ 202.44 million current US$ 203.57 million current US$ Liberia
2000s 167.96 million current US$ 710.45 million current US$ 542.48 million current US$ Liberia
2010s -42.23 million current US$ 398.21 million current US$ 440.45 million current US$ Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total oda private net, dac donors, Equatorial Guinea or Liberia?
Liberia, at -107.27 million current US$ against -126.18 million current US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
What is the difference in total oda private net, dac donors between Equatorial Guinea and Liberia?
18.91 million current US$, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Liberia?
38 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2011.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Liberia rank globally for total oda private net, dac donors?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 48th and Liberia ranks 47th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Liberia: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/total-oda-private-net-dac-donors-current-us/equatorial-guinea/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/total-oda-private-net-dac-donors-current-us/equatorial-guinea/liberia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Liberia: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 2,470 data points, 1968–2011
Last refreshed

Net private aid is private transactions broken down into direct investment, portfolio investment and export credits (net). Private transactions are those undertaken by firms and individuals resident in the reporting country. Portfolio investment corresponds to bonds and equities. Inflows into emerging countries’ stocks markets, are, however, heavily understated. Accordingly, the coverage of portfolio investment differs in these regards from the coverage of bank claims, which include indistinguishably export credit lending by banks. The bank claims data represent the net change in banks’ claims after adjustment to eliminate the effect of changes in exchange rates. They are therefore a proxy for net flow data, but are not themselves a net flow figure. They differ in two further regards from other OECD data. First, they relate to loans by banks resident in countries which report quarterly to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Secondly, no adjustment has been made to exclude short-term claims. Data are expressed in current U.S. dollars.