Eritrea vs Guinea-Bissau: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors

Eritrea
-4.21 million current US$
in 2011
Guinea-Bissau
-1.85 million current US$
in 2011
Eritrea rank
34th
Guinea-Bissau rank
32nd

Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors over time

  • Eritrea
  • Guinea-Bissau
-40.0M-20.0M020.0M40.0M196919902011

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports -1.85 million current US$ against -4.21 million current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 2.36 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Eritrea ranks 34th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 32nd of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s -3.21 million current US$ -4.24 million current US$ 1.04 million current US$ Eritrea
2000s -2.08 million current US$ -5.35 million current US$ 3.27 million current US$ Eritrea
2010s -2.46 million current US$ 2.46 million current US$ 4.91 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total oda private net, dac donors, Eritrea or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at -1.85 million current US$ against -4.21 million current US$ in Eritrea as of 2011.
What is the difference in total oda private net, dac donors between Eritrea and Guinea-Bissau?
2.36 million current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Guinea-Bissau?
19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
How do Eritrea and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for total oda private net, dac donors?
Eritrea ranks 34th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Guinea-Bissau: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/total-oda-private-net-dac-donors-current-us/eritrea/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/total-oda-private-net-dac-donors-current-us/eritrea/guinea-bissau/">Eritrea vs Guinea-Bissau: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 2,470 data points, 1968–2011
Last refreshed

Net private aid is private transactions broken down into direct investment, portfolio investment and export credits (net). Private transactions are those undertaken by firms and individuals resident in the reporting country. Portfolio investment corresponds to bonds and equities. Inflows into emerging countries’ stocks markets, are, however, heavily understated. Accordingly, the coverage of portfolio investment differs in these regards from the coverage of bank claims, which include indistinguishably export credit lending by banks. The bank claims data represent the net change in banks’ claims after adjustment to eliminate the effect of changes in exchange rates. They are therefore a proxy for net flow data, but are not themselves a net flow figure. They differ in two further regards from other OECD data. First, they relate to loans by banks resident in countries which report quarterly to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Secondly, no adjustment has been made to exclude short-term claims. Data are expressed in current U.S. dollars.