Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors

Eswatini
-14.80 million current US$
in 2011
Sao Tome and Principe
-10.68 million current US$
in 2011
Eswatini rank
37th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
36th

Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-100.0M0100.0M200.0M196919902011

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports -10.68 million current US$ against -14.80 million current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 4.12 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Eswatini ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 36th of 53 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1980s 2.47 million current US$ 2.16 million current US$ 307,143 current US$ Eswatini
1990s 13.02 million current US$ -2.17 million current US$ 15.20 million current US$ Eswatini
2000s 2.88 million current US$ -1.19 million current US$ 4.07 million current US$ Eswatini
2010s -10.64 million current US$ -7.09 million current US$ 3.54 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total oda private net, dac donors, Eswatini or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at -10.68 million current US$ against -14.80 million current US$ in Eswatini as of 2011.
What is the difference in total oda private net, dac donors between Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
4.12 million current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2011.
How do Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for total oda private net, dac donors?
Eswatini ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 36th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/total-oda-private-net-dac-donors-current-us/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/total-oda-private-net-dac-donors-current-us/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/">Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 2,470 data points, 1968–2011
Last refreshed

Net private aid is private transactions broken down into direct investment, portfolio investment and export credits (net). Private transactions are those undertaken by firms and individuals resident in the reporting country. Portfolio investment corresponds to bonds and equities. Inflows into emerging countries’ stocks markets, are, however, heavily understated. Accordingly, the coverage of portfolio investment differs in these regards from the coverage of bank claims, which include indistinguishably export credit lending by banks. The bank claims data represent the net change in banks’ claims after adjustment to eliminate the effect of changes in exchange rates. They are therefore a proxy for net flow data, but are not themselves a net flow figure. They differ in two further regards from other OECD data. First, they relate to loans by banks resident in countries which report quarterly to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Secondly, no adjustment has been made to exclude short-term claims. Data are expressed in current U.S. dollars.