South Africa vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors

South Africa
5.34 billion current US$
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa
5.02 billion current US$
in 2011
South Africa rank
1st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
4th

Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors over time

  • South Africa
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
010.0B20.0B30.0B196819892011

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 5.34 billion current US$ against 5.02 billion current US$ in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 321.24 million current US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 4th of 53 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1.79 billion current US$ 3.30 billion current US$ 1.51 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 5.59 billion current US$ 9.77 billion current US$ 4.18 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 4.10 billion current US$ 12.91 billion current US$ 8.80 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total oda private net, dac donors, South Africa or Sub-Saharan Africa?
South Africa, at 5.34 billion current US$ against 5.02 billion current US$ in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2011.
What is the difference in total oda private net, dac donors between South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa?
321.24 million current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa?
19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
How do South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for total oda private net, dac donors?
South Africa ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/total-oda-private-net-dac-donors-current-us/south-africa/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/total-oda-private-net-dac-donors-current-us/south-africa/sub-saharan-africa/">South Africa vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total ODA Private Net, DAC donors (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 2,470 data points, 1968–2011
Last refreshed

Net private aid is private transactions broken down into direct investment, portfolio investment and export credits (net). Private transactions are those undertaken by firms and individuals resident in the reporting country. Portfolio investment corresponds to bonds and equities. Inflows into emerging countries’ stocks markets, are, however, heavily understated. Accordingly, the coverage of portfolio investment differs in these regards from the coverage of bank claims, which include indistinguishably export credit lending by banks. The bank claims data represent the net change in banks’ claims after adjustment to eliminate the effect of changes in exchange rates. They are therefore a proxy for net flow data, but are not themselves a net flow figure. They differ in two further regards from other OECD data. First, they relate to loans by banks resident in countries which report quarterly to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Secondly, no adjustment has been made to exclude short-term claims. Data are expressed in current U.S. dollars.