Brazil vs Papua New Guinea: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
2,162 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
2,289 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
93rd
Papua New Guinea rank
91st

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Papua New Guinea
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019962023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 2,289 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,162 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 127 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Brazil ranks 93rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 91st of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 41.47 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 41.47 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1980s 313.85 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 75.94 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 237.92 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 224.11 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 103.54 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 120.58 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 1,118 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 169.21 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 949.13 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 501.86 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 402.62 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 99.24 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 1,765 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,847 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 82.34 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 2,289 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,162 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Papua New Guinea?
127 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Papua New Guinea?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Papua New Guinea rank globally for use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 93rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 91st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Papua New Guinea: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/papua-new-guinea/">Brazil vs Papua New Guinea: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,774 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.