Cambodia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

Cambodia
1,913 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
1,987 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
97th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
95th

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cambodia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019962023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 1,987 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,913 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 74 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 97th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 95th of 121 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1980s 140.74 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 128.33 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 12.42 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Cambodia
1990s 268.11 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 248.79 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 19.32 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Cambodia
2000s 489.27 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 378.25 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 111.03 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Cambodia
2010s 690.72 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 631.84 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 58.88 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 1,622 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,365 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 257.86 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Cambodia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 1,987 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,913 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Cambodia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
74 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
Cambodia ranks 97th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 95th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/tanzania/">Cambodia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,774 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.