Dominica vs Sao Tome and Principe: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

Dominica
56,529 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
64,021 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
10th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
8th

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominica
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020.0k40.0k60.0k197720002023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 64,021 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 56,529 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Dominica, a difference of 7,492 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Dominica's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 10th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 8th of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 4 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1980s 8,752 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,095 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 7,657 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 3,131 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 857.32 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 2,274 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 14,967 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 5,260 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 9,708 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 32,954 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 16,802 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 16,152 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 56,628 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 57,532 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 904.27 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Dominica or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 64,021 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 56,529 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Dominica as of 2023.
What is the difference in use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe?
7,492 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
Dominica ranks 10th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 8th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Sao Tome and Principe: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/sao-tome-and-principe/">Dominica vs Sao Tome and Principe: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,774 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.