Ecuador vs El Salvador: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
37,176 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
42,379 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
13th
El Salvador rank
12th

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • El Salvador
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k197019962023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 42,379 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 37,176 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 5,203 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 13th and El Salvador ranks 12th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador El Salvador Difference Ahead
1970s 10.36 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 407.15 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 396.79 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 908.95 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 3,389 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 2,480 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 504.28 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 166.41 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 337.87 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 928.99 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 2,808 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,879 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 2,816 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 11,486 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 8,670 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 33,805 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 42,359 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 8,554 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 42,379 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 37,176 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and El Salvador?
5,203 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and El Salvador?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and El Salvador rank globally for use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 13th and El Salvador ranks 12th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs El Salvador: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/el-salvador/">Ecuador vs El Salvador: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,774 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.