Ecuador vs Low income: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
37,176 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income
1,589 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
13th
Low income rank
12th

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Low income
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019962023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 37,176 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,589 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 35,587 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 23.4 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 13th and Low income ranks 12th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Low income in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Low income Difference Ahead
1970s 10.36 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 36.43 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 26.07 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Low income
1980s 908.95 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 261.04 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 647.91 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 504.28 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 294.81 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 209.47 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 928.99 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 377.97 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 551.03 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 2,816 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 526.99 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 2,289 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 33,805 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,386 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 32,419 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Low income?
Ecuador, at 37,176 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,589 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Low income?
35,587 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Low income?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Low income rank globally for use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 13th and Low income ranks 12th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Low income: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/low-income/">Ecuador vs Low income: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,774 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.