Ecuador vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Ecuador
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 37,176 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,972 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 34,204 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 12.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 13th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 10th of 121 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 10.36 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 37.49 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 27.13 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 908.95 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 292.36 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 616.59 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 504.28 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 360.27 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 144.01 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 928.99 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 425.47 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 503.52 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 2,816 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 888.5 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,927 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 33,805 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 2,605 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 31,200 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Ecuador, at 37,176 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,972 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 34,204 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 13th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 10th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.