El Salvador vs Rwanda: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

El Salvador
42,379 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
32,973 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
12th
Rwanda rank
15th

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Rwanda
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k197019962023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 42,379 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 32,973 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 9,406 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 407.15 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 42.62 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 364.53 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 3,389 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 363.32 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 3,026 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 166.41 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,181 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,015 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 2,808 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 3,461 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 652.99 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 11,486 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 7,559 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 3,927 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 42,359 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 26,602 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 15,757 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Rwanda?
El Salvador, at 42,379 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 32,973 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Rwanda?
9,406 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Rwanda rank globally for use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Rwanda: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/rwanda/">El Salvador vs Rwanda: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,774 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.