El Salvador vs Sri Lanka: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

El Salvador
42,379 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
46,133 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
12th
Sri Lanka rank
11th

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Sri Lanka
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 46,133 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 42,379 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 3,754 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

El Salvador ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 11th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 407.15 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 2,641 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 2,234 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 3,389 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 6,353 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 2,963 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 166.41 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 7,480 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 7,314 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 2,808 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 7,464 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 4,656 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 11,486 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 30,308 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 18,822 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 42,359 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 39,200 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 3,159 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 46,133 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 42,379 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Sri Lanka?
3,754 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sri Lanka?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Sri Lanka rank globally for use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 11th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Sri Lanka: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sri-lanka/">El Salvador vs Sri Lanka: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,774 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.