Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 64,021 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,797 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), a difference of 58,224 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 11.0 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ahead.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 8th of 12 groups.
Across the 6 decades both report, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 137.07 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 0 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 137.07 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 224.52 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 547.57 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 323.05 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 1990s | 367.93 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 857.32 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 489.39 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 633.51 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 5,260 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 4,626 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 2,373 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 16,802 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 14,429 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 5,687 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 57,532 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | 51,846 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 64,021 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,797 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 58,224 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
- How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for use of imf credit (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 8th of 12 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.