Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Use of IMF credit

Azerbaijan
689.89 million DOD, current US$
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina
703.58 million DOD, current US$
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
71st
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
70th

Use of IMF credit over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B199320082024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 703.58 million DOD, current US$ against 689.89 million DOD, current US$ in Azerbaijan, a difference of 13.68 million DOD, current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 71st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 70th of 123 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
1990s 296.38 million DOD, current US$ 66.51 million DOD, current US$ 229.87 million DOD, current US$ Azerbaijan
2000s 415.85 million DOD, current US$ 148.74 million DOD, current US$ 267.11 million DOD, current US$ Azerbaijan
2010s 232.97 million DOD, current US$ 718.93 million DOD, current US$ 485.96 million DOD, current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 613.05 million DOD, current US$ 916.75 million DOD, current US$ 303.71 million DOD, current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit, Azerbaijan or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 703.58 million DOD, current US$ against 689.89 million DOD, current US$ in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
What is the difference in use of imf credit between Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
13.68 million DOD, current US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for use of imf credit?
Azerbaijan ranks 71st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 70th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Use of IMF credit. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/azerbaijan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/azerbaijan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Use of IMF credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
135 places, 6,055 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Use of IMF Credit: Data related to the operations of the IMF are provided by the IMF Treasurer’s Department. They are converted from special drawing rights into dollars using end-of-period exchange rates for stocks and average-over-the-period exchange rates for flows. IMF trust fund operations under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Extended Fund Facility, Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, and Structural Adjustment Facility (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility in 1999) are presented together with all of the IMF’s special facilities (buffer stock, supplemental reserve, compensatory and contingency facilities, oil facilities, and other facilities). SDR allocations are also included in this category. According to the BPM6, SDR allocations are recorded as the incurrence of a debt liability of the member receiving them (because of a requirement to repay the allocation in certain circumstances, and also because interest accrues). This debt item is introduced for the first time this year with historical data starting in 1999.