Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)

Belarus
1.40 billion DOD, current US$
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
1.69 billion DOD, current US$
in 2025
Belarus rank
46th
Papua New Guinea rank
42nd

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$) over time

  • Belarus
  • Papua New Guinea
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B197419992025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 1.69 billion DOD, current US$ against 1.40 billion DOD, current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 294.84 million DOD, current US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 46th and Papua New Guinea ranks 42nd of 124 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 276.87 million DOD, current US$ 41.09 million DOD, current US$ 235.77 million DOD, current US$ Belarus
2000s 853.18 million DOD, current US$ 76.63 million DOD, current US$ 776.55 million DOD, current US$ Belarus
2010s 1.68 billion DOD, current US$ 182.33 million DOD, current US$ 1.50 billion DOD, current US$ Belarus
2020s 1.24 billion DOD, current US$ 1.05 billion DOD, current US$ 188.10 million DOD, current US$ Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit, Belarus or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 1.69 billion DOD, current US$ against 1.40 billion DOD, current US$ in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in use of imf credit between Belarus and Papua New Guinea?
294.84 million DOD, current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Papua New Guinea?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Papua New Guinea rank globally for use of imf credit?
Belarus ranks 46th and Papua New Guinea ranks 42nd of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Use of IMF credit. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/belarus/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/belarus/papua-new-guinea/">Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Use of IMF credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
137 places, 6,249 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Use of IMF Credit: Data related to the operations of the IMF are provided by the IMF Treasurer’s Department. They are converted from special drawing rights into dollars using end-of-period exchange rates for stocks and average-over-the-period exchange rates for flows. IMF trust fund operations under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Extended Fund Facility, Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, and Structural Adjustment Facility (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility in 1999) are presented together with all of the IMF’s special facilities (buffer stock, supplemental reserve, compensatory and contingency facilities, oil facilities, and other facilities). SDR allocations are also included in this category. According to the BPM6, SDR allocations are recorded as the incurrence of a debt liability of the member receiving them (because of a requirement to repay the allocation in certain circumstances, and also because interest accrues). This debt item is introduced for the first time this year with historical data starting in 1999.