China vs Russian Federation: Use of IMF credit

China
47.22 billion DOD, current US$
in 2024
Russian Federation
24.01 billion DOD, current US$
in 2022
China rank
1st
Russian Federation rank
3rd

Use of IMF credit over time

  • China
  • Russian Federation
020.0B40.0B60.0B197019972024

How they compare

China currently reports 47.22 billion DOD, current US$ against 24.01 billion DOD, current US$ in Russian Federation, a difference of 23.21 billion DOD, current US$.

That makes China's figure about 2.0 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Russian Federation ahead.

China ranks 1st and Russian Federation ranks 3rd of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Russian Federation in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 325.01 million DOD, current US$ 23.02 billion DOD, current US$ 22.70 billion DOD, current US$ Russian Federation
2000s 1.40 billion DOD, current US$ 11.69 billion DOD, current US$ 10.28 billion DOD, current US$ Russian Federation
2010s 10.16 billion DOD, current US$ 8.24 billion DOD, current US$ 1.91 billion DOD, current US$ China
2020s 36.31 billion DOD, current US$ 19.14 billion DOD, current US$ 17.17 billion DOD, current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit, China or Russian Federation?
China, at 47.22 billion DOD, current US$ against 24.01 billion DOD, current US$ in Russian Federation as of 2024.
What is the difference in use of imf credit between China and Russian Federation?
23.21 billion DOD, current US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Russian Federation?
24 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
How do China and Russian Federation rank globally for use of imf credit?
China ranks 1st and Russian Federation ranks 3rd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Russian Federation: Use of IMF credit. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/china/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/china/russian-federation/">China vs Russian Federation: Use of IMF credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
134 places, 6,029 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Use of IMF Credit: Data related to the operations of the IMF are provided by the IMF Treasurer’s Department. They are converted from special drawing rights into dollars using end-of-period exchange rates for stocks and average-over-the-period exchange rates for flows. IMF trust fund operations under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Extended Fund Facility, Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, and Structural Adjustment Facility (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility in 1999) are presented together with all of the IMF’s special facilities (buffer stock, supplemental reserve, compensatory and contingency facilities, oil facilities, and other facilities). SDR allocations are also included in this category. According to the BPM6, SDR allocations are recorded as the incurrence of a debt liability of the member receiving them (because of a requirement to repay the allocation in certain circumstances, and also because interest accrues). This debt item is introduced for the first time this year with historical data starting in 1999.