Djibouti vs Sao Tome and Principe: Use of IMF credit

Djibouti
100.99 million DOD, current US$
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
63.92 million DOD, current US$
in 2024
Djibouti rank
107th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
110th

Use of IMF credit over time

  • Djibouti
  • Sao Tome and Principe
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M197720002024

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 100.99 million DOD, current US$ against 63.92 million DOD, current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 37.07 million DOD, current US$.

That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.6 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Djibouti has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 107th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 110th of 123 countries.

Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 8.18 million DOD, current US$ 466,346 DOD, current US$ 7.71 million DOD, current US$ Djibouti
2000s 21.61 million DOD, current US$ 5.05 million DOD, current US$ 16.56 million DOD, current US$ Djibouti
2010s 45.04 million DOD, current US$ 16.13 million DOD, current US$ 28.91 million DOD, current US$ Djibouti
2020s 97.91 million DOD, current US$ 56.97 million DOD, current US$ 40.94 million DOD, current US$ Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit, Djibouti or Sao Tome and Principe?
Djibouti, at 100.99 million DOD, current US$ against 63.92 million DOD, current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in use of imf credit between Djibouti and Sao Tome and Principe?
37.07 million DOD, current US$, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Sao Tome and Principe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Djibouti and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for use of imf credit?
Djibouti ranks 107th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 110th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Sao Tome and Principe: Use of IMF credit. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/djibouti/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/djibouti/sao-tome-and-principe/">Djibouti vs Sao Tome and Principe: Use of IMF credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
135 places, 6,055 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Use of IMF Credit: Data related to the operations of the IMF are provided by the IMF Treasurer’s Department. They are converted from special drawing rights into dollars using end-of-period exchange rates for stocks and average-over-the-period exchange rates for flows. IMF trust fund operations under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Extended Fund Facility, Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, and Structural Adjustment Facility (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility in 1999) are presented together with all of the IMF’s special facilities (buffer stock, supplemental reserve, compensatory and contingency facilities, oil facilities, and other facilities). SDR allocations are also included in this category. According to the BPM6, SDR allocations are recorded as the incurrence of a debt liability of the member receiving them (because of a requirement to repay the allocation in certain circumstances, and also because interest accrues). This debt item is introduced for the first time this year with historical data starting in 1999.