Ecuador vs Egypt: Use of IMF credit

Ecuador
9.92 billion DOD, current US$
in 2024
Egypt
15.12 billion DOD, current US$
in 2024
Ecuador rank
10th
Egypt rank
7th

Use of IMF credit over time

  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B25.0B197019972024

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 15.12 billion DOD, current US$ against 9.92 billion DOD, current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 5.20 billion DOD, current US$.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.5 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Egypt ahead.

Ecuador ranks 10th and Egypt ranks 7th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Egypt in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Egypt Difference Ahead
1970s 2.87 million DOD, current US$ 195.09 million DOD, current US$ 192.22 million DOD, current US$ Egypt
1980s 251.63 million DOD, current US$ 236.86 million DOD, current US$ 14.78 million DOD, current US$ Ecuador
1990s 138.29 million DOD, current US$ 115.52 million DOD, current US$ 22.77 million DOD, current US$ Ecuador
2000s 230.73 million DOD, current US$ 317.72 million DOD, current US$ 86.99 million DOD, current US$ Egypt
2010s 699.32 million DOD, current US$ 4.17 billion DOD, current US$ 3.47 billion DOD, current US$ Egypt
2020s 8.70 billion DOD, current US$ 20.05 billion DOD, current US$ 11.35 billion DOD, current US$ Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit, Ecuador or Egypt?
Egypt, at 15.12 billion DOD, current US$ against 9.92 billion DOD, current US$ in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in use of imf credit between Ecuador and Egypt?
5.20 billion DOD, current US$, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Egypt?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Egypt rank globally for use of imf credit?
Ecuador ranks 10th and Egypt ranks 7th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Egypt: Use of IMF credit. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/ecuador/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/ecuador/egypt-arab-rep/">Ecuador vs Egypt: Use of IMF credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
134 places, 6,029 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Use of IMF Credit: Data related to the operations of the IMF are provided by the IMF Treasurer’s Department. They are converted from special drawing rights into dollars using end-of-period exchange rates for stocks and average-over-the-period exchange rates for flows. IMF trust fund operations under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Extended Fund Facility, Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, and Structural Adjustment Facility (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility in 1999) are presented together with all of the IMF’s special facilities (buffer stock, supplemental reserve, compensatory and contingency facilities, oil facilities, and other facilities). SDR allocations are also included in this category. According to the BPM6, SDR allocations are recorded as the incurrence of a debt liability of the member receiving them (because of a requirement to repay the allocation in certain circumstances, and also because interest accrues). This debt item is introduced for the first time this year with historical data starting in 1999.