Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho: Use of IMF credit

Guinea-Bissau
122.20 million DOD, current US$
in 2024
Lesotho
145.33 million DOD, current US$
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
105th
Lesotho rank
102nd

Use of IMF credit over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Lesotho
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M197019972024

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 145.33 million DOD, current US$ against 122.20 million DOD, current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 23.13 million DOD, current US$.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Lesotho ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 105th and Lesotho ranks 102nd of 122 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Difference Ahead
1970s 161,007 DOD, current US$ 636,610 DOD, current US$ 475,603 DOD, current US$ Lesotho
1980s 3.16 million DOD, current US$ 5.09 million DOD, current US$ 1.92 million DOD, current US$ Lesotho
1990s 8.54 million DOD, current US$ 27.84 million DOD, current US$ 19.30 million DOD, current US$ Lesotho
2000s 18.81 million DOD, current US$ 37.37 million DOD, current US$ 18.56 million DOD, current US$ Lesotho
2010s 39.09 million DOD, current US$ 102.95 million DOD, current US$ 63.86 million DOD, current US$ Lesotho
2020s 95.40 million DOD, current US$ 164.14 million DOD, current US$ 68.73 million DOD, current US$ Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit, Guinea-Bissau or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 145.33 million DOD, current US$ against 122.20 million DOD, current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in use of imf credit between Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho?
23.13 million DOD, current US$, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho rank globally for use of imf credit?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 105th and Lesotho ranks 102nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho: Use of IMF credit. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/guinea-bissau/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/guinea-bissau/lesotho/">Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho: Use of IMF credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
134 places, 6,029 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Use of IMF Credit: Data related to the operations of the IMF are provided by the IMF Treasurer’s Department. They are converted from special drawing rights into dollars using end-of-period exchange rates for stocks and average-over-the-period exchange rates for flows. IMF trust fund operations under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Extended Fund Facility, Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, and Structural Adjustment Facility (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility in 1999) are presented together with all of the IMF’s special facilities (buffer stock, supplemental reserve, compensatory and contingency facilities, oil facilities, and other facilities). SDR allocations are also included in this category. According to the BPM6, SDR allocations are recorded as the incurrence of a debt liability of the member receiving them (because of a requirement to repay the allocation in certain circumstances, and also because interest accrues). This debt item is introduced for the first time this year with historical data starting in 1999.