Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)

Montenegro
114.78 million DOD, current US$
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
72.65 million DOD, current US$
in 2025
Montenegro rank
107th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
110th

Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$) over time

  • Montenegro
  • Sao Tome and Principe
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M197720012025

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 114.78 million DOD, current US$ against 72.65 million DOD, current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 42.13 million DOD, current US$.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.6 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Montenegro ranks 107th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 110th of 124 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 39.98 million DOD, current US$ 7.22 million DOD, current US$ 32.76 million DOD, current US$ Montenegro
2010s 37.52 million DOD, current US$ 16.13 million DOD, current US$ 21.39 million DOD, current US$ Montenegro
2020s 155.91 million DOD, current US$ 59.58 million DOD, current US$ 96.33 million DOD, current US$ Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit, Montenegro or Sao Tome and Principe?
Montenegro, at 114.78 million DOD, current US$ against 72.65 million DOD, current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
What is the difference in use of imf credit between Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe?
42.13 million DOD, current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for use of imf credit?
Montenegro ranks 107th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 110th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: Use of IMF credit. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/montenegro/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/montenegro/sao-tome-and-principe/">Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: Use of IMF credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
137 places, 6,249 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Use of IMF Credit: Data related to the operations of the IMF are provided by the IMF Treasurer’s Department. They are converted from special drawing rights into dollars using end-of-period exchange rates for stocks and average-over-the-period exchange rates for flows. IMF trust fund operations under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Extended Fund Facility, Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, and Structural Adjustment Facility (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility in 1999) are presented together with all of the IMF’s special facilities (buffer stock, supplemental reserve, compensatory and contingency facilities, oil facilities, and other facilities). SDR allocations are also included in this category. According to the BPM6, SDR allocations are recorded as the incurrence of a debt liability of the member receiving them (because of a requirement to repay the allocation in certain circumstances, and also because interest accrues). This debt item is introduced for the first time this year with historical data starting in 1999.