Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Use of IMF credit

Papua New Guinea
1.25 billion DOD, current US$
in 2024
Zimbabwe
1.33 billion DOD, current US$
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
49th
Zimbabwe rank
47th

Use of IMF credit over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
0500.0M1.0B1.5B197019972024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.33 billion DOD, current US$ against 1.25 billion DOD, current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 70.34 million DOD, current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 18.78 million DOD, current US$ 0 DOD, current US$ 18.78 million DOD, current US$ Papua New Guinea
1980s 34.39 million DOD, current US$ 129.50 million DOD, current US$ 95.11 million DOD, current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 46.89 million DOD, current US$ 295.39 million DOD, current US$ 248.51 million DOD, current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 76.63 million DOD, current US$ 254.80 million DOD, current US$ 178.17 million DOD, current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 182.33 million DOD, current US$ 492.22 million DOD, current US$ 309.89 million DOD, current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 920.23 million DOD, current US$ 1.19 billion DOD, current US$ 269.77 million DOD, current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of imf credit, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.33 billion DOD, current US$ against 1.25 billion DOD, current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in use of imf credit between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
70.34 million DOD, current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
51 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for use of imf credit?
Papua New Guinea ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Use of IMF credit. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-imf-credit-dod-current-us/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Use of IMF credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
134 places, 6,029 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Use of IMF Credit: Data related to the operations of the IMF are provided by the IMF Treasurer’s Department. They are converted from special drawing rights into dollars using end-of-period exchange rates for stocks and average-over-the-period exchange rates for flows. IMF trust fund operations under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Extended Fund Facility, Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, and Structural Adjustment Facility (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility in 1999) are presented together with all of the IMF’s special facilities (buffer stock, supplemental reserve, compensatory and contingency facilities, oil facilities, and other facilities). SDR allocations are also included in this category. According to the BPM6, SDR allocations are recorded as the incurrence of a debt liability of the member receiving them (because of a requirement to repay the allocation in certain circumstances, and also because interest accrues). This debt item is introduced for the first time this year with historical data starting in 1999.